Friday, April 29, 2022

Early Grief



Grief is something not always experienced at the time of physical loss. Often it happens years earlier, in a single moment, or more subtly—in increments—over months drawn out into decades.


When grief is located earlier on the timeline of death, it is usually because the reality of a relationship with another person, or the behavior of that person, has been able to be put into proper context, allowing an emotional working—through which leads to a realistic acceptance. 


In this, the grieving person frequently finds peace with the other person, and with themselves, that otherwise would never have happened.


That is because this early grief, as I like to call it, frees the grieving person, finally, from wishing and hoping.


When a relationship or person can be truly and unequivocally accepted as never going to change, grief can, and does, usually follow at some point (anger or other emotions may precede grief, and as those are worked through, then grief can flow). 


This acceptance ends the never-ending cycle of getting one’s hopes up only to have them dashed once again.


Acceptance brings wishing to a stop as well, because the grief of dreams not panning out is essentially what acknowledges that the dream is dead, and in fact, was a dead dream all along (in spite of many efforts by the grieving person over the years to make it come true). 


To better illustrate this, we can take the example of an alcoholic parent, for whom everything was tried to assist them towards, and support them in, sobriety, to no avail. Once honest and sincere acceptance that this person is not going to change, or respond to anyone’s efforts and love, occurs, we can and most likely will, have no other response but to grieve. 


It’s what the world calls “reality sinking in.”


The grief experienced in this situation is for the admitting that there is nothing more one can do for the parent’s alcoholism, but it is also for the lost relationship that could have been but never was (or was once, and lost to drinking). 


And it is also for the life the parent has lost to their own drinking.


One may also grieve over no longer holding out any hope, which has, in the past, provided some semblance of comfort, along with the delusion of, “If we could just find the right answer (or pray hard enough), we could control the situation."


It isn’t that we give up and call it quits once reality, and healthy grief, takes place. 


Certainly if the alcoholic rallies and begins steps to recovery, one can—making sure to manage expectations—be there for the person. 


It is more a matter of attitude and perspective. 


Once the grieving person has found closure in the situation being what it is, they are always open to the alcoholic’s recovery, but not expecting it. 


Having grieved, they move on in peace that, when and if the time comes for the parent’s sobriety, the son or daughter will be in a much better place to maintain an objective, and cautious approach and response—made all the easier by the fact that they have already grieved. Any emotions—and delusional dreaming—that recur will be much easier to keep in check.


So when the day comes that the alcoholic passes from this earth, and some of those related to them do not appear to be in grief, it is because the grief the onlookers are expecting to see has taken place months, years, or even decades before. 


I used an alcoholic as an obvious example. But this process applies to a variety of every day relationships and situations, the details of which are unique to each and every person, mind and heart. 


I believe the stereotypical measure of grief, based on how much emotional output is exerted at a funeral, or even in the last years or days of a loved one, is a misread.


Early grief is just as much grief as present, sudden, “at-the-funeral” grief, and is also expressed through tears and anguish—most likely when nobody was around to notice, and occurring long before a deceased’s heart stopped beating.




Copyright Barb Harwood









Thursday, April 21, 2022

Opinionating


Merriam-Webster dictionary states that the word “opinionate” is “obsolete.” 

But before it was deemed  “obsolete,” the word meant “grounded on opinion; “lacking firm factual basis.”


So, I ask, why in the world has Merriam-Webster declared the word “opiniate” obsolete when it has been, increasingly so, many folks’ very pastime?


Granted, there is such a thing as a doctor’s experienced opinion, or a court-judge’s legal opinion. I’m not talking about that here.


I’m zeroing in on the opinionating, specifically, about another person or persons, and that to opinionate in this manner is to gossip. 


Merriam-Webster defines gossip as “a person who habitually reveals personal or sensational facts about others.” 


Now, Merriam-Webster has further definitions, but I stop at this one because it is what I run into most often, especially with extended family, who often think that, not only do they have the right as a family member to share another member’s news, but that this sharing is not gossip. 


Therefore, I thank Merriam-Webster profusely for defining what I have understood gossip to be all along: the sharing—especially chronically, of other people’s news, stories, purchases, plans and so forth.


Most “Those Who Think They are in the Know” types are so focused on the fact that they are the bearer of news that they never get around to noticing, or even pausing to consider, how this popping of other people’s balloons, stealing their thunder, or just divulging anything and everything as soon as they get the microphone, might irritate the bejabbers out of people who would prefer that their news, stories and purchases be theirs to do with as they please. Especially when this sharing of “news” undermines other people’s relationships with each other, not to mention that with “Loose Lips."


When a person participates in opinionating about others on a constant basis, they can develop a false understanding of the person being opinionated about (especially if they refuse to actually talk to and interact with the person being discussed). 


The opinionators instead rely upon their own, or other opinionators’ takeaways, and then begin to believe that they truly and honestly know the person being trashed, discussed, lamented over, or “worried” about (the worry being feigned so as to ignite initial, or more, opinionating!). 


In actuality, these conjecturing instigators are usually way off base.


I point this out because I am well acquainted with people who amaze me in their ability to know right from wrong, and to have remarkable compassion and ability to serve wholeheartedly, but are the worst when it comes to needing to be the family, office or neighborhood Town Crier


And yet, they would never see themselves as a gossip, because they have a very narrow perception of gossip (the main perception being that it is something only others do!!


Their sense of self negates the negative in their own person, while magnifying it in others. 


But you’ll note that their tendency, even if sharing a fact (the details of which they often get wrong) is also to embellish. 


They simply cannot help themselves from stating a “fact” and then adding commentary. 


This opinionating is, in truth, mere speculation, usually motivated by sour grapes, jealousy, anger, resentment, or a sense of personal pride being threatened. 


Insecure people are the most frequent gossips—and remember—gossip includes the sharing of even spot-on facts (if one has permission to share, that is of course different. But the temptation may still exist to opinionate with others after the initial disclosure). 


So, for example, someone purchases a home. In opinionating, the one who was never granted permission to tell this news to others plows ahead with the information anyway, and the wild rumpus of barbs and cutting assumptions behind the home-purchaser’s back begins!:


“They can’t afford it!”


“That house needs soooo much work!!” 


“I don’t know why they would choose to move there!!!” 


And on. And on. And on it goes.


By sharing another’s news, the sharer has now upstaged the other person, and thus, fed their own personal addiction to drama. That, in turn, feeds their unquenchable need to be seen, heard, significant and, most importantly, to be the first and wisest in their fine-sounding opinionating.


But it is gossip, plain and simple. 


And whether it is revealing facts or fictions about people or events, it is not justified, as it so often is, with the obviously and pathetically defensive, “I was just giving my opinion.”


Copyright Barb Harwood






Friday, April 15, 2022

Innocence


Jesus was born, lived, died, rose again and lives, for lost innocence.

For all lost innocence, in all the world.


It is why he sorrowed as he looked out over the people (Matthew 9:36). 


It is why he wept (John 11:35). 


It is why he does not accuse, but responds to all self-righteous accusers that each can begin throwing their opinionated, malevolent stones as soon as they admit they are perfect, and therefore cannot, themselves, be accused of any negative trait or failure (John 8:7). 


It is why he watched, silently, as the New Testament accusers dropped their stones and walked away, their consciences convicted (John 8:9). 


Innocence.


Lost, addressed, overcome in death, and ever available in new life. 



copyright, Barb